When i reflect on all that we've looked at in this class, there are many interesting topics. From the communication circuit to map content distortion, each has caused me to take a deeper look at the world of language texts and technology. But the topic that stuck the most with me the evolution of literature from print to electronic.
This particular topic was covered in several of the readings and assignments, and hits particularly close to home as i am an avid reader and there has been a boon of e-books and e-readers recently. The beginning of Haye's "The Republic of ABC: Alphabetizing Americans, 1750-1850", was very affective in furthering my understanding of the impact of media evolution by proposing a what-if situation between monks concerning the shift from hand written books to printed books. By starting the reading this way i learned that the shift from one type of literature to another had a deeper meaning and significance than i had originally thought. the introduction of the printing press lead to greater availability of book and more freedom for those who wished to express their thoughts and ides through text. The creation and expansion of the Internet and digital culture was a reflection of past technological advances, allowing for a nearly universal exchange of ideas.
Throughout the readings i have found many correlations between printing presses and digital media, such as piracy and fixity. Given unlimited time and resources i believe that i would find more correlations between past and present. i would focus more on the controversies that the shifts in technology had in their respective times, and use evidence from each to make some educated guesses about what the future may hold. As we grow in technology and as a culture, so to must our literature evolve with the times. I find the topic of literary evolution fascinating and am interested to see how will develop.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Final Paper Topic
Inspired by this week's reading revolving around interactive entertainment, I have decided to revolve my final paper around narrative in video games. For years video games have been labeled as mindless entertainment massed produced for children and trigger happy college students. but as a DTC major and a gamer, i see the textual and narrative potentials present in games. There are many different genres of gaming, each able to introduced narrative properties on par with today's other media, and i feel that negative view of games in this respect should change so that we may embrace it for all that it has done and all that it can do for us through narration.
I believe that this medium should be counted among the texts and narratives found in movies in television. My paper will argue the narrative properties available in video games and how interactive entertainment should be viewed as a valid outlet for it. I will support my paper with the readings from this week, academic studies, video and written interviews with various game designers, and my own personal experiences with this medium. I will also compare gaming to other media such as movies and television in order to express similarities between them and validate the inclusion of interactive entertainment as a narrative medium.
Video games have a lot more to offer other than as a diversion. With games such as Fable and Mass Affect, critics can no longer claim with any validity that this medium has no purpose as a narrative medium. And i hope this paper will have a part in placing games in their proper place alongside movies and television as a narrative medium.
I believe that this medium should be counted among the texts and narratives found in movies in television. My paper will argue the narrative properties available in video games and how interactive entertainment should be viewed as a valid outlet for it. I will support my paper with the readings from this week, academic studies, video and written interviews with various game designers, and my own personal experiences with this medium. I will also compare gaming to other media such as movies and television in order to express similarities between them and validate the inclusion of interactive entertainment as a narrative medium.
Video games have a lot more to offer other than as a diversion. With games such as Fable and Mass Affect, critics can no longer claim with any validity that this medium has no purpose as a narrative medium. And i hope this paper will have a part in placing games in their proper place alongside movies and television as a narrative medium.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Ltiarary Importance
Q: In the reading, Hayles began by using monks to compare the literary importance of hand-written vs mechanically printed literature. They discussed how printing decreased the value of literature as precious artifact, allowed others the ease to flood the world with "commonplace scribbling," and affect the culture by letting uneducated people access literature and interpret the works themselves instead of relying on those more learned in the subject to do so for them. Given the accessibility made available with the invention of the Internet, have Brother Paul's fears come true? Has new technology lessened the value of books, flooded the market with nonsensical ramblings, and affected the culture through it's availability? Give modern day examples to support your argument.
Potential Answer:
While the advancement in technology has certainly affected the world, i believe that Brother Paul's fears, though having some legitimacy, where blown out of proportion. Today, books are becoming more antiquated as electronic literature is becomes more popular. But that doesn't necessarily mean that books are less valuable in our culture. They will always have a place in the world and may even become more valuable as technology makes them more obsolete. The problem with a system based purely on electronic literature is that while more available, it also runs the risk of being fragile. Power outages, computer viruses, and other manner of electronic mayhem can destroy thousands of books stored on a nook or i-pad just as easily as a fire could destroy many tomes within a library. Hard copies are always going to be necessary, and often literary enthusiasts prefer them to more advanced version (such as myself). There is even a niche for rare books that are much more valuable than when the were first printed. The use of books may be going down, but their value has not decreased.
As for the availability of electronic media, Brother Paul viewed such advancement negatively, but i see it as a positive result . while there are millions of blogs and tweets about useless inane crap, there are just as many with valuable thought provoking information. while technology allows crazies and jackasses to voice their opinions, it also allows those with something worthwhile to say have a medium in which to be heard. And just as written literature has changes the world for the better, so to shall the openness of electronic literature affect modern times.
Potential Answer:
While the advancement in technology has certainly affected the world, i believe that Brother Paul's fears, though having some legitimacy, where blown out of proportion. Today, books are becoming more antiquated as electronic literature is becomes more popular. But that doesn't necessarily mean that books are less valuable in our culture. They will always have a place in the world and may even become more valuable as technology makes them more obsolete. The problem with a system based purely on electronic literature is that while more available, it also runs the risk of being fragile. Power outages, computer viruses, and other manner of electronic mayhem can destroy thousands of books stored on a nook or i-pad just as easily as a fire could destroy many tomes within a library. Hard copies are always going to be necessary, and often literary enthusiasts prefer them to more advanced version (such as myself). There is even a niche for rare books that are much more valuable than when the were first printed. The use of books may be going down, but their value has not decreased.
As for the availability of electronic media, Brother Paul viewed such advancement negatively, but i see it as a positive result . while there are millions of blogs and tweets about useless inane crap, there are just as many with valuable thought provoking information. while technology allows crazies and jackasses to voice their opinions, it also allows those with something worthwhile to say have a medium in which to be heard. And just as written literature has changes the world for the better, so to shall the openness of electronic literature affect modern times.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
ABC: Minor Changes, Majore Differences
While thinking of an example for the assignment, my mind jumped around from several different subjects, mostly involving the alphabet. This seems like a logical choice as the alphabet and its importance in our culture, especially after reading these articles, is very clear. Language is the foundation of humanity, and learning to communicate can have profound effects on our lives and our history. Merely changing how one is taught can influence the world view of the learner in subtle ways.
For example, when i was still learning to read and right, my teachers would associate letters of the alphabet with inanimate objects and places. A was for apple, C was for car, Z for zoo, K for kickball, etc, etc. Because A was the first letter i ever learned and it was represented by a particular object (apples), the fruit in question became in my mind linked to academia in general. This seems to be a common connection, as whenever i remember the decorations in elementary school, the apple was heavily present in association with learning, appearing next to books and diplomas, and the old tradition of giving an apple to ones teacher.
But lets pretend that i was raised in a different climate, such as one where religion was more prevalent and influential in the culture. A Christian school would most likely use different associations with each letter in order to teach. Therefore A would be for Abraham, B for bible, C for Christ, etc. By doing so, children who learned through this method would have the religious beliefs ingrained into their psyche, reinforcing their belief in their faith. But lets take this a bit further. If it was still a religious area, but a more strict, fire and brimstone wrath of god kind of community, the alphabetic teaching methods would adapt to comply with this variation of the belief. A would change from Abraham to Abomination, B from bible to blasphemy, H would be hell, D damnation, and so on. This reflects the difference in the culture's religion while simultaneously teaching children a harsher view of god and their faith.
Ways of teaching the alphabet could also instill a sense of economic class differences. In situations such as medieval times, a peasant's method of teaching would involve associations with plants, animals, and agricultural tools, while a Noble's alphabet would consist of political and etiquette terms. Both of these methods create a separation between classes, creating large social-economic gaps which could then fuel resentment or entitlement towards the opposite class. This could lead to conflict between the two, eventually paving the way for oppression and rebellions that eventually leave large impacts in history.
There are hundreds of other situations and variations as to how something as seemingly simple as learning the alphabet can affect people and events, but the point is clear. Children grow up and change the world. They rely upon what they were taught and whatever they learned at an early age makes a big difference in how they view the world, be it politically, religiously, or socially.
For example, when i was still learning to read and right, my teachers would associate letters of the alphabet with inanimate objects and places. A was for apple, C was for car, Z for zoo, K for kickball, etc, etc. Because A was the first letter i ever learned and it was represented by a particular object (apples), the fruit in question became in my mind linked to academia in general. This seems to be a common connection, as whenever i remember the decorations in elementary school, the apple was heavily present in association with learning, appearing next to books and diplomas, and the old tradition of giving an apple to ones teacher.
But lets pretend that i was raised in a different climate, such as one where religion was more prevalent and influential in the culture. A Christian school would most likely use different associations with each letter in order to teach. Therefore A would be for Abraham, B for bible, C for Christ, etc. By doing so, children who learned through this method would have the religious beliefs ingrained into their psyche, reinforcing their belief in their faith. But lets take this a bit further. If it was still a religious area, but a more strict, fire and brimstone wrath of god kind of community, the alphabetic teaching methods would adapt to comply with this variation of the belief. A would change from Abraham to Abomination, B from bible to blasphemy, H would be hell, D damnation, and so on. This reflects the difference in the culture's religion while simultaneously teaching children a harsher view of god and their faith.
Ways of teaching the alphabet could also instill a sense of economic class differences. In situations such as medieval times, a peasant's method of teaching would involve associations with plants, animals, and agricultural tools, while a Noble's alphabet would consist of political and etiquette terms. Both of these methods create a separation between classes, creating large social-economic gaps which could then fuel resentment or entitlement towards the opposite class. This could lead to conflict between the two, eventually paving the way for oppression and rebellions that eventually leave large impacts in history.
There are hundreds of other situations and variations as to how something as seemingly simple as learning the alphabet can affect people and events, but the point is clear. Children grow up and change the world. They rely upon what they were taught and whatever they learned at an early age makes a big difference in how they view the world, be it politically, religiously, or socially.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
The Affects of Physical and Digital Cartography
In this day and age, maps, at least to me, are taken for granted. With modern technology such as satellite imaging and computer graphics it is easy for one to believe that we have reached the pinnacle of cartographic perfection. I mean, who can argue that a map is inaccurate when it is a, supposedly, unaltered photograph? But what we, or at least i, failed to realize was the significant power that maps wield, for political, theological, social, and military purposes. And according to the readings this week, it is still a powerful tool that is being used today, by both conventional paper maps and online digital maps.
In the past, maps were used as a way of staking claims, dividing lands into manageable portions which allowed for both political and social control. For example, In the middle ages (approximately) rulers would partition their lands to various dukes, lords, and other such nobles. By mapping out and assigning each region of their kingdom the rulers were better able to regulate property rights and have more control over population, laws, taxes, trades, and overall instill a more permanent social order where status was based on land ownership (Harley, pg.7) However, today, while map still serves the purpose of defining territories they are also being used to further the agendas of various people and organizations. This is in part due to the greater variety of maps available thanks to social and technological development. Although the physical landscape is set in stone, the features and destinations can be tweaked for certain needs.
For example,According to Harley (pg 8-10) purposefully misplacing key locations on a map was a military tactic used by Russians to help curb potential invasions. Another example from Harley would be naming landmarks other their native name was used as a way to instill subliminal religious or territorial messages, adding to the territorial claiming argument i stated earlier. A modern day example would be the tourism and advertisement fields. Every tourism brochure maps have defined landmarks (such as buildings or public areas) with the intention of drawing in potential customers. Maps based on surveys often distort information to highlight their desired messages, which is why all such maps must be taken with a grain of salt.
When it comes to online maps, according to Farman the advent of social networking tools allows people everywhere to modify these. Digitizing maps allows for more accurate topographical accuracy but allows for a vast amount of modification by both companies and consumers. The biggest example of such a thing would be the I-Phone and its thousands of apps. There are ones for planning routs, locating restaurants, connecting to google maps, even posting where one has been including pictures of these locations. by being able to share these application and personal information via facebook and twitter, we then become the ones who shape maps, creating our own landmarks and locations, giving our own opinions of where the best place to go is and being able to tell it to the world. By doing so we then are able to shape how others see the world, opening up new possibilities that go unnoticed on conventional paper maps due to marketing and tourism needs.
In the past, maps were used as a way of staking claims, dividing lands into manageable portions which allowed for both political and social control. For example, In the middle ages (approximately) rulers would partition their lands to various dukes, lords, and other such nobles. By mapping out and assigning each region of their kingdom the rulers were better able to regulate property rights and have more control over population, laws, taxes, trades, and overall instill a more permanent social order where status was based on land ownership (Harley, pg.7) However, today, while map still serves the purpose of defining territories they are also being used to further the agendas of various people and organizations. This is in part due to the greater variety of maps available thanks to social and technological development. Although the physical landscape is set in stone, the features and destinations can be tweaked for certain needs.
For example,According to Harley (pg 8-10) purposefully misplacing key locations on a map was a military tactic used by Russians to help curb potential invasions. Another example from Harley would be naming landmarks other their native name was used as a way to instill subliminal religious or territorial messages, adding to the territorial claiming argument i stated earlier. A modern day example would be the tourism and advertisement fields. Every tourism brochure maps have defined landmarks (such as buildings or public areas) with the intention of drawing in potential customers. Maps based on surveys often distort information to highlight their desired messages, which is why all such maps must be taken with a grain of salt.
When it comes to online maps, according to Farman the advent of social networking tools allows people everywhere to modify these. Digitizing maps allows for more accurate topographical accuracy but allows for a vast amount of modification by both companies and consumers. The biggest example of such a thing would be the I-Phone and its thousands of apps. There are ones for planning routs, locating restaurants, connecting to google maps, even posting where one has been including pictures of these locations. by being able to share these application and personal information via facebook and twitter, we then become the ones who shape maps, creating our own landmarks and locations, giving our own opinions of where the best place to go is and being able to tell it to the world. By doing so we then are able to shape how others see the world, opening up new possibilities that go unnoticed on conventional paper maps due to marketing and tourism needs.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
dtc 375 assignment # 5
With the advent of the technological boon within the last decade alone, the issue of credibility and fixity have changed drastically from the past. Just as the invention of the printing press had changed the world of literature in the past, internet databases and web pages have, in a weird way, both simplified and complicated these two issues in different ways.
In olden times, credibility could be iffy. As books were hand made in this time it would have been a fairly simple matter to copy someone other's work and claim it as your own. the Invention of printing presses have eased the matter credibility by giving information to reinforce it, such as publishing the publishing company, copyright date, etc, etc. Because of this we can then determine the book's credibility. Another advantage is fixity. Printing helped to alleviate the various mistakes and changes of interpretations caused by scribes who had to hand write each copy of the book. This created uniformed books that that, according to Adrian Johns (reading pgs 4-5), helped to stabilize several aspects of of life such as law, language, and science due to the consistency created by identical texts.
However, the internet has both simplified researching credibility and fixity while making it more difficult in some aspects. It is a well known fact that with enough time and effort one can find pretty much anything on the internet. with the myriad of search engines available it is usually an easy task to track down information concerning a book's credibility. however, these same advantages can also lead one on a wild goose chase. Anybody can publish something thanks to the internet, be it something intellectually stimulating, creative, or downright insane. There are just as many, and likely even more, acts of fallacy and pirating out there raising the difficulty of ascertaining the work's credibility.
Yet if one knows where to look, they can find the same signs that they would see in printed texts to help discover how trustworthy the article is, such as citations, publisher, etc. Copyright and plagiarism laws have been created and modified to include the internet and reduce piracy, adding to the heavy regulations created for printing and other medias that provide the tools to identify credibility and promote fixity.
So, in conclusion, the advent of internet makes things easier by providing tools and resources for authors, while simultaneously adding a level of difficulty due to the vast amount of content it opens us up to.
In olden times, credibility could be iffy. As books were hand made in this time it would have been a fairly simple matter to copy someone other's work and claim it as your own. the Invention of printing presses have eased the matter credibility by giving information to reinforce it, such as publishing the publishing company, copyright date, etc, etc. Because of this we can then determine the book's credibility. Another advantage is fixity. Printing helped to alleviate the various mistakes and changes of interpretations caused by scribes who had to hand write each copy of the book. This created uniformed books that that, according to Adrian Johns (reading pgs 4-5), helped to stabilize several aspects of of life such as law, language, and science due to the consistency created by identical texts.
However, the internet has both simplified researching credibility and fixity while making it more difficult in some aspects. It is a well known fact that with enough time and effort one can find pretty much anything on the internet. with the myriad of search engines available it is usually an easy task to track down information concerning a book's credibility. however, these same advantages can also lead one on a wild goose chase. Anybody can publish something thanks to the internet, be it something intellectually stimulating, creative, or downright insane. There are just as many, and likely even more, acts of fallacy and pirating out there raising the difficulty of ascertaining the work's credibility.
Yet if one knows where to look, they can find the same signs that they would see in printed texts to help discover how trustworthy the article is, such as citations, publisher, etc. Copyright and plagiarism laws have been created and modified to include the internet and reduce piracy, adding to the heavy regulations created for printing and other medias that provide the tools to identify credibility and promote fixity.
So, in conclusion, the advent of internet makes things easier by providing tools and resources for authors, while simultaneously adding a level of difficulty due to the vast amount of content it opens us up to.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)